Wednesday, January 19, 2005

Beltre for Third, Continued

To continue my earlier thoughts along the Beltre lines, here's another link that has a good discussion of whether or not the Beltre signing is a good one:

Okay, so I'm a bit behind the times and missed out on that discussion. Still, it's a good discussion about Beltre, and I give the debate victory over to David Cameron. After all, he's much more versed in the minors than a lot of folks, and has a lot clearer reasons why it's a good signing.

My vote is that it's a good one. No, he may not hit .334/48/121 again, but then again, maybe he will. He's no Jeff Cirillo, folks!


At 1/20/2005 12:34 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said...


Glad to see you've jumped on board the symbol set bandwagon! ;)

Loved the Puchy Delgado comment BTW...



Post a Comment

<< Home