Beltre for Third, Continued
To continue my earlier thoughts along the Beltre lines, here's another link that has a good discussion of whether or not the Beltre signing is a good one:
Okay, so I'm a bit behind the times and missed out on that discussion. Still, it's a good discussion about Beltre, and I give the debate victory over to David Cameron. After all, he's much more versed in the minors than a lot of folks, and has a lot clearer reasons why it's a good signing.
My vote is that it's a good one. No, he may not hit .334/48/121 again, but then again, maybe he will. He's no Jeff Cirillo, folks!